Open Source Stats

verified statistics · every figure sourced · comparison tables, not single numbers
Home / Comparisons / OpenAI Codex CLI vs Gemini CLI

OpenAI Codex CLI vs Gemini CLI

OpenAI Codex CLI leads by 22,859 stars · measured readings plus reconstructed growth

As of 2026-10-24, OpenAI Codex CLI has 130,797 GitHub stars and Gemini CLI has 107,938, a gap of 22,859. Over the 90 days measured from 2026-07-02 to today, OpenAI Codex CLI grew +37.7% against Gemini CLI at +2.0%.

Where they stand

OpenAI Codex CLI Gemini CLI
GitHub stars130,797107,938
Forks20,63714,804
Open issues24,607762
Read at2026-10-242026-10-24
Both counts were read from the GitHub REST API; each links to its own provenance page below.

Growth over time

WindowOpenAI Codex CLI Gemini CLI
30 days+8.4%+1.0%
90 days+37.7%+2.0%
180 days+85.2%+8.2%
365 days+186.7%+39.1%
Growth is reconstructed from dated Wayback Machine captures of each repository page, never interpolated. A missing row means no capture fell close enough to that window to state a figure honestly.

Which way the gap is moving

OpenAI Codex CLI passed Gemini CLI between 2026-07-06 and today, and now leads by 22,859 stars.
Between 2026-07-02 and the current reading, OpenAI Codex CLI gained 35,841 stars and Gemini CLI gained 2,154. Over that window the gap widened by 12,031 stars, from 10,828 to 22,859.

The two records

What this comparison does not say

A star count measures attention, not quality, adoption or satisfaction. A repository with fewer stars can be the better tool, and a fast-growing one can be growing for reasons unrelated to merit. Nothing here is a recommendation, and the arithmetic in "which way the gap is moving" is not a prediction.